Modern Slavery Reporting Requirements
Kenneth Hong, John Kim · 30 March 2021
In Australia, the Modern Slavery Act 2018 commenced operation on 1 January 2019, creating reporting obligations for certain entities. The term modern slavery is used to describe situations where coercion, threats or deception are used to exploit victims and undermine or deprive them of their freedom. It describes serious exploitation and not substandard working conditions or the underpayment of workers. The Australian government, in support of UN Guiding Principles, aims to combat modern slavery in the Australian community and in the global supply chains of Australian goods and services.

Who needs to report?
Entities that have:
- Consolidated revenue of at least $100 million for the relevant reporting period (a financial year), and which
- Are Australian identities, or
- Undertake business in Australia in that financial year
What do I need to report?
The mandatory criterion are:
- The reporting entity’s structure, operations and supply chains;
- Modern slavery risks in the reporting entity’s operations and supply chains (including those of subsidiary entities);
- Actions taken (including by subsidiary entities) to assess and address those modern slavery risks, including due diligence and remediation processes;
- How the reporting entity assesses the effectiveness of actions taken; and
- The process of consultation with subsidiary entities in preparing the modern slavery statement.
When do I need to report by?
Affected entities must report in respect of the first full reporting period following commencement and must report within 6 months of that period ending. For example, the reporting period for entities with a 30 June year end will be 1 July 2021 to 30 June 2022, with reporting due by 31 December 2022.
Further information
Further information and links to the online registers can be found here: https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/criminal-justice/Pages/modern-slavery.aspx
Please contact H & H Lawyers for further legal advice for submitting a modern slavery report.
Key Contacts

Kenneth Hong
Partner

John Kim
Partner
Related Insights
View MoreWorkplace & Employment Litigation,Employment Contracts, Policies & Procedures, and Award Interpretations,Employment Disputes
29 May 2026
Modern Slavery Reporting Requirements For Australian Subsidiaries and Foreign Entities in Australia
As we approach mid-year, many Australian subsidiaries of multinational corporations and foreign entities registered in Australia should be preparing their modern slavery statements. This article examines the reporting obligations under Australian laws, including the critical issue of revenue consolidation that often catches foreign-owned entities by surprise. The Reporting Obligation Australia’s Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth) (the “Act”) requires entities to submit annual modern slavery statements if they meet the revenue threshold.
Employment Contracts, Policies & Procedures, and Award Interpretations
09 January 2023
Key changes to Australian employment law
On 6 December 2022, the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs Better Pay) Act 2022 received Royal Assent, amending the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). The key amendments to the Fair Work Act are as follows: 1. Casual Conversion – currently in effect 2.
Workplace & Employment Litigation,Employment Contracts, Policies & Procedures, and Award Interpretations,Employment Disputes
04 April 2022
High Court Clarifies Definition of Casual Employee
As one of the most significant decisions by the High Court in 2021, the High Court has determined the meaning of a casual employee in Workpac Pty Ltd v Rossato [2021] HCA 23. Mr Rossato was employed as a production worker by Workpac’s labour-hire company under a series of six contracts, or assignments, to perform work for one of Workpac’s clients. While Mr Rossato was required to work regular and full-time hours according to a fixed pattern of work, Workpac treated Mr Rossato as a casual employee, such that Mr Rossato was not paid the leave or public holiday entitlements under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act) and the enterprise agreement. The Court confirmed that the question of whether a person is a casual employee is to be determined by considering the express terms of a written employment contract, and not on the basis of any subsequent conduct of either party. To this extent, the court held any such commitment to further work must be contained in an enforceable agreement to be recognised. The High Court held that a casual employee is an employee who has no “firm advance commitment as to the duration of the employee’s employment or the days (or hours) the employee will work” and provides no reciprocal commitment to the employer.
Employment Contracts, Policies & Procedures, and Award Interpretations
24 June 2020
Casual vs Permanent
On 20 May 2020, the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia handed down its decision in WorkPac Pty Ltd v Rossato. The case centres around labour hire firm WorkPac, which employed Robert Rossato as a mine worker at two Queensland mines owned by Glencore. Mr Rossato was a casual employee, on rolling contracts, over a three-and-a-half-year period.
Employment Contracts, Policies & Procedures, and Award Interpretations
01 August 2018
Are You At Risk of Sham Contracting?
Online food delivery competitor Foodora has been accused of sham contracting its own employees and now faces legal action launched by Australia’s Fair Work Ombudsman. As business opportunities increase in Australia more employers turn to flexible and intuitive ways to cut costs and maximise profits, which can sometimes lead to cutting corners and the underpayment of employees. It is important for an employer to enter into valid employment contracts with its employees, as it will assist them in avoiding the risk of being accused of sham contracting. What is Sham Contracting? Sham contracting is an illegal method of employment under section 357 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), where the employer misrepresents the employee as an independent contractor. Any employer that makes such misrepresentation of the employment relationship is liable for penalties under that Act.