Corporate Governance

A good corporate governance framework contributes significantly to the successful management and operation of a company. Transparency, responsibility, accountability and responsiveness are the key components and indicators of good governance. Implementing a sound governance framework is important to ensure that responsible entities comply with their legal obligations, make sound decisions and act in the best interests of their investors.

We advise on the full range of corporate governance issues, including but not limited to directors' duties and responsibilities, conflicts management, continuous disclosure, ASX and ASIC notices, annual reports, shareholder and board meetings, corporate constitutions and charters, regulatory compliance, remuneration and incentive plans, and company secretarial services.

Professionals

Yukio Hayashi

Partner

Kenneth Hong

Partner

Related Insights

Corporate and Commercial Disputes,Corporate & M&A,Corporate Governance

27 February 2026

AML/CTF Reforms – What Existing Reporting Entities Need to Do before 31 March 2026

1. Overview of the Reforms Significant changes to Australia’s Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing (AML/CTF) regime are taking effect under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment Act 2024 (the Amendment Act) and the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules 2025 (the Rules). These reforms represent a fundamental shift toward an outcomes-based, risk-oriented framework, aligned with international standards set by the Financial Action Task Force.

Corporate and Commercial Disputes,Corporate Advisory, M&A,Corporate & M&A,Arbitration,Contracts & Commercial Agreements,Corporate Governance,Compliance & Advisory Services

13 August 2025

Ad hoc and Institutional Arbitration

Arbitration is an increasingly preferred alternative to traditional litigation, particularly in commercial and international disputes. For businesses engaged in cross-border transactions, especially within the Asia-Pacific region, choosing between institutional and ad hoc arbitration can significantly influence the efficiency, cost and enforceability of dispute resolution. This article outlines key differences and practical considerations to help parties make informed decisions.

Corporate and Commercial Disputes,Corporate Advisory, M&A,Corporate & M&A,Arbitration,Contracts & Commercial Agreements,Corporate Governance

15 July 2025

How Can International Arbitration Be Made Cost Effective?

Making International Arbitration More Cost Effective International arbitration remains a preferred method for resolving cross-border disputes, especially in the Asia-Pacific. However, the process can be costly and protracted, often attracting criticism from commercial parties who seek timely and efficient outcomes. As arbitration continues to evolve in the region, cost effectiveness requires coordinated efforts from parties, arbitrators, institutions and legislators alike.

Director's Responsibilities,Corporate Advisory, M&A,Director's Duties Disputes,Shareholders, Partnership & Joint Venture Disputes,Corporate Governance

27 October 2021

When quorum cannot be constituted at shareholders’ meetings

In a dispute between shareholder and director or joint venture partners, particularly of a small proprietary company, or when company affairs are in deadlock, a common method of opposition by a shareholder is to refuse to attend a shareholders’ meeting so the necessary quorum is not present and the resolutions cannot be passed. In such circumstances, court may intervene to convene a meeting and prescribe a quorum. Section 249G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) provides that: "249G – Calling of Meetings of Members by the Court 1. The Court may order a meeting of the company's members to be called if it is impracticable to call the meeting in any other way.